|
|
The advantage of understanding
acoustic communication as a system, instead of as isolated stimulus-response
reactions, is that an intervention at any point in the system can
cause cascaded effects throughout it, whether for its improvement
or even its deterioration and destruction. The individual listener
within a soundscape is not engaged in a passive type of energy reception,
but rather is part of a dynamic system of information exchange.

As there is more noise and more people in smaller spaces, we all
contribute to an increased difficulty in acoustic information exchange
and perpetrate the failure of harmony in the acoustic environment.
An obvious example might be a social gathering where the guests
have to raise their voices and even yell to understand each other.
The guests are competing for aural space in which to hear each other
and themselves. From this example we see that with the increase
of sound sources, the sounds become more difficult to decipher.
ƒ aural
competition
|
|